Banner

Archive for the ‘peak oil’ Category

To Maine on the train

Icon Written by Morgan Giddings on August 23, 2009 – 7:23 am

Jim Kunstler is famous, or perhaps infamous is a better word, in the “peak oil” community for his prophecies of gloom and doom to be set upon the USA due to our profligacy and oil dependency.

Kuntstler is a controversial figure, in part because he constantly predicts doom to beset us, and in part because of his rather loudmouth style that includes lots of swear words to make his point. While some of what Kunstler says may hit some underlying truths about whether our lifestyles are sustainable (or not), his message is weakened by a few problems. First, the constant prophecies of doom don’t come true. And second, he is a hypocrite.

In his most recent blog post, titled “The First Die-Off” he talks about driving his car back from a vacation on Cape Cod, and being stuck in traffic. He claims there is “no train service” and uses that as his excuse for having driven the car.

Please.

I just came back from a trip to Maine on the train, with 3 small kids in tow. We stayed on the beach in a town not all that far north of Cape Cod (south of Portland, Maine). The train was comfortable, relatively convenient, and relatively cost effective. We rented a bike once we were there, and used it for most of our errands.

Kid walking on beach of Biddeford Pool

Nina on the beach by Biddington Pool

Kid on the beach in Maine

It annoys me to no end to have someone like Kunstler constantly harping on “the end of the world as we know it,” and then in the very same essay, to be so blatantly participating in the very activities he laments as leading us to The End.

In fact, from the comments section by user “signalfire” after his blog post:

Isn’t the problem that EVERYone thinks THEY are the ones who are ’special’?? THEY deserve a holiday at the beach. THEY deserve cheap energy. THEY deserve big houses. THEY deserve their Escalades, Hummers and Jet Skiis..

This hits the nail on the head. Why does Kunstler preach that we’re going to have a massive die-off on the one hand, and yet so blithely participate in the very same activities, such as driving to and from the beach? People pay attention to him. If he had taken the bus, or ridden his bike, or taken the train, then his diatribes might not have seemed quite so silly.

I noticed something in the small town of Biddeford Pool that we stayed in. It was an excellent place for getting around by bike or foot – except that there was so much tourist-related automobile traffic, that it wasn’t that great. One of my friends there, who likes to bike, remarked that it would be great if there were less traffic. The very same person was the one out driving the car nearly every day to run this errand or that, such as to pick up morning newspapers.

Sunset view from Maine Cottage

Biddington Pool in Maine, Sunset

Biddeford Pool, ME

The main difference between my friend and Kunstler is that one might expect Kunstler to know better, given that talking about Peak Oil is the main focus of his life. His efforts to educate people on the topic are greatly diluted by such obvious hypocrisy.

I don’t claim to be perfect – I consume some oil, too. But I make efforts to minimize it, and set an example as to how life can be enjoyed with a minimum of oil. Aside from taking the train as frequently as possible for trips – which I’ve come to really enjoy – I like to show that bikes can be used for tasks that people often think of as requiring a car. The most recent example is the move of several heavy server systems from my Lab from an old location in an out of date server room to a much more modern facility. The computers are 8-core Apple Xserves, each weighing about 40 lbs. I readily carried two of them together, totaling about 80 lbs, on my bike, and the errand was far quicker than it would have been by car, because parking on campus is a nightmare. With the bike, I rode right up to the door at both the starting point and the destination. Later, when we have to move 40 of them, I’ll enlist the Yuba Mundo, a bike that can carry up to 400lbs or so of cargo. By moving 8 of them at a time, with each trip taking only 5 minutes, we can have the moving part done in under an hour.

Moving an Xserve by bicycle

Morgan Transporting Cluster Node

Moving 2 Apple Xserve servers on the electrified Surly Big Dummy bicycle

So I challenge James Kunstler: if you’re serious about all this gloom and doom, then go out and set an example of how to avoid it. Show us the alternative. Don’t just whine about how bad it is going to get. Help provide an alternative.

That’s what I’m doing in my “spare time” – helping customers of Cycle 9 find oil-free alternatives for every day errands and tasks. Really, I don’t have any spare time – with small kids at home and a more than full time faculty job, my life is often seen by others as “insane”. People ask me how I do it. How I do it is by being inspired to help people. The thing that keeps me going is seeing the joy of people whom we help discover there is a better way than dependency on the oil companies. A way that is healthy and brings regular joy in the way that being stuck in a car in traffic does not. The latest example is Cory, who is profiled in the next blog post.

Kunstler, it is your turn to help people find a better way, rather than just being seen as a whiner.



The state of things

Icon Written by Morgan Giddings on July 4, 2009 – 2:15 pm


It’s been a while since I posted to the Cycle 9 blog. The hiatus was in part due to a lot of grant writing that I had to do for my day job. There’s this thing called the “stimulus” that congress passed, and they are trying to stimulate scientific research. And so government agencies like the National Institutes of Health are accepting grant proposals to spend the stimulus money. Well, since I work at a major research university (the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), I was obliged to write some grant proposals. With all the grant writing, the blog was left a bit lonely.

But in the background, a lot has been going on at Cycle 9, in terms of bike stuff. Let’s see what I can dig up from the recesses of my memory:
  • We got a few of the Marin hardtail mountain bikes in stock. Some folks had asked for a more aggressive looking bike for their everyday riding, and the Marin bikes fit the bill. They make a great platform for an everyday commuter bike, or for an electric conversion. We’re not about to switch over to carrying a whole shopful of full suspension mountain bikes. I love mountain biking, but that’s not what the store is about. We’re here to promote transportation and utility biking. And we have the mountain bikes for people who prefer the look and feel of that to a more road oriented bike.
  • We have lots of kids bikes in stock from Marin. They make a nice lineup. We also have the “running bikes”. These are bikes without pedals, that the kids use by “running” along while seated on the bike – kind of like Flinstones. My daughter learned how to bike this way, and it was a lot faster that learning how to deal with pedals. Once she was balancing on the running bike, then moving over to a regular pedal bike without training wheels was easy.
  • We’re getting some of the new “electric mountain drive” assist kits in from Ecospeed. It is a chain-drive electric assist, that has the advantage of using the bike’s existing gear set. So they are claimed to be better for steep hill climbing, and to have better efficiency than hub motors. We’ll be testing one out extensively, and we’ll also have a demo in the shop.
  • Speaking of demo bikes, we are also a Stokemonkey dealer (the only one on the East Coast!), and now have a Surly Big Dummy utility bike (great for kid and grocery hauling), with the Stokemonkey installed. The Stokemonkey is like the Ecospeed, but it is designed specifically for cargo bikes like the Xtracycle, Big Dummy, and Yuba Mundo. It is a very high efficiency, quiet motor setup that has power for big loads and very steep hills. Come try it out!
  • If you want to charge your electric bike battery faster, we now have a new line of chargers in for the long-life LiFePO4 (lithium ion) battery type. One of them is a dual-voltage dual-amperage charger that puts out 9 amps in “fast charge” mode, fast enough to recharge a 10 amp-hour pack in just over an hour. But since charging batteries fast too often may shorten their life, this charger also has a 4 amp slower-charging mode, that will take 2-3 hours for a full charge. Not only that, it has dual voltage, so it can charge either a 36 volt or a 48 volt pack, at either current rate! We have a few 20A/48V chargers for large electric vehicle batteries. And we have some 6 amp dual-voltage chargers (36 and 48V). In this first run, we only have a few of each kind. Once they’re gone, they’re gone for a while.
  • We now have the small Day 6 frames in stock, available for a test ride. The Day 6 is an extremely comfortable ride like a recumbent bike, but it is more upright. Several folks have come in to try the Day 6 before or after testing a Townie at another bike shop in town, and a lot of them prefer the comfort of the Day 6. The new small frames are designed for people 5′3″ and under.

I’m sure there is a lot more to talk about, but let’s save that for another post. I want to talk about the economy for a few moments.
Lots of people seem to think we’ve got green shoots. It would probably be best for our shop to just pretend that is the case and act as if everything is going to be hunky dory tomorrow. But sorry folks, it isn’t. I’m a bit of an economics junkie. I do a lot of reading. And there’s an elephant in the room. That elephant is:
DEBT
If I could have used a larger font for that word, I would have. The reason why is I want to emphasize the scale of the problem. Our country is in hawk. Under water. We’ve sold off our children’s future to the pawnbrokers.

This has all happened before… during the 20’s. See, back then a similar thing happened. There got to be a very few rich industrialists at the top of the pyramid, and a lot of other folks who were quite poor. The disparity between rich and poor got more and more extreme. But most people didn’t know it – because there was a debt bubble. So, while people were getting poorer, they kept feeling richer – because they got more and more in debt. That was the roaring 20’s, until it came to a screeching halt in the crash of ‘29. But ironically, in 1930 there were newspaper reports very much like our “green shoots” reports now. Everything was going to go back to normal. Things would start roaring again. And what happened next? It was three more years until the economy would bottom out in 1933. The middle class was eviscerated. So were the poor folks. A few rich folks were just fine, but everyone else was not. There was a debt hangover that had to be cured.

Well, our debt as a country is bigger now than it was at the height of the great depression, when FDR was doing all-out government spending to try to dig this country out of the mess. Obama is trying to spend our way out of it – but the problem is, the spending is all in the form of ever more debt (not that the alternative of outright printing is any better). But our country can’t handle more debt. Our creditors like the Chinese are getting sick of lending us money – because they don’t see how we’ll pay it back. And they’re the only ones lending these days.

To bring it back to bikes, here’s the thing: we import well over $500 billion per year in foreign oil. What do we trade this for? Debt, debt, and more debt. Not anything real – the US doesn’t produce all that much anymore, except debt, and dollars (which represent debt).

I frequently have conversations with folks about oil. People seem to think there is a “glut” of oil, and that oil prices should come back down. Well, aside from the fact that the “glut” consists of only 20-30 days worth of US oil consumption, there is a much bigger fact being ignored: the price we pay at the pump is a direct correlation to the strength or weakness of the dollar. If the dollar gets stronger, that means oil and gas get cheaper for us. If the dollar gets weaker, that means oil and gas are more expensive for us. The dollar got a lot stronger last winter, which is a major reason why gas prices dropped. Now the dollar is weakening again. While it could do anything over the next 6-12 months (go up or down), the long-term prognosis is absolutely clear: there are too many dollars in the system, and our creditors are getting tired of taking those dollars in return for real, tangible things like oil and manufactured goods. This will not be dollar positive. What that means is that, even if we ignore the major geological constraints on oil supplies (i.e. peak oil), that it is very likely to get much more expensive for us at the pump in the future. We can “drill baby, drill” all we want, and it will be a drop in the bucket compared to what we import.

So, folks, be prepared for increasing costs in the future. Unless our government and the Federal Reserve bank manage to pull off a miracle of getting an economic recovery while holding the dollar’s value, we will be paying more and more at the pump.

And cap-n-trade isn’t going to help, either. I’m anti pollution and anti-CO2 being released, but this cap and trade thing has me mad. It is just another scheme for some very rich folks to get even richer trading in carbon credits. It would have been far better to just be honest about it and charge a direct carbon tax. And then to use that tax to build things like bike paths, rail lines, and etc. But, no, we’ll just let some rich folks get richer, and we will all pay more money at the pump.

So, anyway, why would you want to buy a bike in this economy? Because bikes are one of the very cheapest ways to get around for short and medium-distance trips. Far cheaper than a car. For anyone who is struggling financially and asking “can I afford a bike” – if you can’t afford a bike (at least a used one), then you definitely cannot afford a car. Each month of owning a car costs as much as buying a typical low-end transportation bike. Think about gas, insurance, repairs, and parking. Just the other day, someone I know had to pay over $300 to fix the electric window opener on her car. She had a sudden insight – all it takes is a few such repairs, and an electric bike would be paid for.

It’s funny that occasionally when I’m riding along on the road, some guy in a big pickup will honk or something, trying to tell me to get off the road. I’m sure that most of these folks consider themselves US patriots. But how can they be patriots when they are dependent on foreign oil? When they are contributing to our large US debt, that will weaken our currency?

There was an interesting discussion on the RootsRadicals about the effect that having a US flag on the bike has with folks who might otherwise treat cyclists with disdain.

In that vein, we’re going to do a t-shirt. Here’s a mock-up/draft version:

This t-shirt points out that it is patriotic to ride your bike and free our country from foreign oil. Maybe it will help some drivers who “don’t get it” to start figuring it out. We hope to have this shirt ready in August. Drop us a line if you want one. They’ll be printed right here in North Carolina using organic cotton and chemical free dyes.

Happy 4th, I hope everyone had a great celebration of our country’s independence – and I hope we have many more to come.



Bike ride to Triad Electric Vehicles Association meeting

Icon Written by Morgan Giddings on April 4, 2009 – 7:06 pm

Today I just got back from a nice bike trip with my daughter, to the Triad Electric Vehicles Association meeting, in Burlington, NC. I was invited to their monthly meeting to give a presentation about Lithium batteries and battery management systems, since some of the members are starting to contemplate moving away from lead acid batteries. In fact, two of the members have recently commissioned us to build custom packs for their EV’s.

We rode over there on my electrified Surly Big Dummy, with an eZee electric kit on front. We had 3 different LiFePo4 battery packs (48V x 10 amp hour (Ah), 2 x 36V x 10 amp hour, totaling about 1200 watt hours, which equals a 100 watt lightb
ulb running for 12 hours). I didn’t really expect to use that much battery power on the 33-mile each way ride, but I brought them for show and tell (and glad I did). I also brought some BMS boards (designed by the folks on Endless Sphere), PSI cells, and more. We also had all our overnight gear. So the bike was well loaded with us and all our stuff. I estimate that the gross vehicle weight was close to 400 lbs with us included.
While a round-trip 65 mile bike ride may not sound like a big deal to some folks who ride their road bikes 60+ miles in a day, this was a ride with precious cargo on the back, and a fully loaded bike, on some sections of busy road. I planned the route using Bikely.com, which allows mapping out a route using Google maps. I tried to choose a lower-traffic route most of the way, but some high-traffic stretches were unavoidable (why don’t they put shoulders on the roads in this part of the USA????)
We started out mid Friday afternoon, hoping to make it there before the main rush hour traffic hit. As soon as we got on the road, there were some serious headwinds. The national weather service reports winds averaging 15mph, with gusts up to 43 mph – coming straight from the direction we were going. I was sooooo glad to have electric assist. That would have been a miserable ride without. At one point, I was going full throttle (using about 1,200 watts) and pedaling full tilt, on flat ground into the wind, and only going about 15 miles per hour. Without electric, that would have been about 6 miles per hour. There were also some nice hills, too (totaling about 1,200 feet of up and down). Without electric, and with that headwind, the trip would have easily taken at least 4 hours. Despite the winds, we made it there in 1hr 45 min, at an average speed of just under 18 mph. But we burned up way more energy than I planned – about 24 watt hours per mil
e. (i.e., four miles riding would equal a 100 watt light bulb running for an hour). I had planned on 20 watt hours per mile. Glad I had those extra batteries!
Jack, one of TEVA’s leaders, graciously hosted us for the evening and let us crash at his place. We had a nice dinner and after-dinner discussion about quantum mechanics, consciousness, God, and evolution (I am making slow progress on a book about these subjects). We also had the obligatory discussion of the current financial “crisis”. Anyway, to bed very late, and up somewhat early next morning to head out for the meeting.
So I’m not someone to get shy in front of groups of people, since I give scientific lectures fairly regularly (just gave one last Thursday to an audience of 40-50 people). But this group was a bit intimidating, because there was only one other woman present, and it was about 20 guys, who were obviously quite tech savvy. Well, after some introductions and whatnot, we got down to business and I started describing the ins and outs of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries for electric vehicles. I talked about keeping cells healthy, the benefits and drawbacks of these batteries, and discussed some basic design elements for battery management systems (BMSs), the electronic systems that keep cells healthy. There was some good discussion and questions. Afterwards, we went out to the parking lot to check out the various EV’s there.
Here’s an interesting observation that one of my hosts made: I was one of only 2-3 people who actually used an electric vehicle to get there, and mine was a bicycle.
This was a very interesting observation, so I’m going to sidetrack for a second on that. Why didn’t more people drive their EV’s over there? I can only guess: I think the biggest reason is that of the various people I talked to, many people had lead-acid battery packs that weren’t performing too well anymore, or didn’t have sufficient range, or… etc. One guy mentioned a story about being out in his EV one day and getting stranded when the batteries ran out, and having to walk 3 miles. So here’s the interesting thing. If a bike battery runs out, you can still pedal the bike. Even my nearly 400 pound cargo bike, if I had to, I could pedal it that whole distance. But I think the bigger take-home message is this – the main impediment to people using their EV’s more often is the batteries. For a bike, the battery is relatively small, and hence (though not cheap), not nearly as expensive as for a car or truck-sized vehicle. So nowadays, many people use lithium or at least nickel batteries on bikes, whereas most electric cars of the hobbyist variety are still lead acid. One older gentleman even prodded me a bit because he said he had access to very cheap lead acids, so he didn’t see why it was worth buying lithium batteries. I understand that point of view, that in an ideal world lead acids can run for a very long time, so why pay (lots) extra for LiFePo4? But, being in the e-bike repair business, I have seen so many “dead” e-bikes simply because the batteries died, and people hate having to replace them every few years. And it gets worse when you put them in a series string to produce higher voltage. Aside from the longer life and lighter weight of lithium, there is the lower hassle factor. If you get a working system with a good BMS (very important), it should give many years of service without issues. I used lead acids for many years before I switched. But now that I’ve “seen the light,” it is hard to fathom ever switching back to the heavy, bulky (though cheap up front) lead acids.
But anyway, some people tried out my Big Dummy and had lots of fun. Then a bunch of the members headed off to the Earth Day fair in Greensboro, and we got headed back to Chapel Hill/Carrboro.
This time, the wind was at our backs, and still pretty strong. Sweeeeet! There were a bunch of times we were cruising along with just pedaling, no electric power at > 20 miles per hour, a good clip for a 400 lb cargo bike. We made the return trip in just under 1:30 hrs, averaging almost 19 miles per hour, and using about 16 watt hours per mile. After a nice stop at a friends’ house along the way, we got back home. And after just having biked 68 miles on a fully loaded cargo bike in 1.5 days, I wasn’t totally wiped out (I definitely got some exercise, but not to the point of being wiped).
Total stats for the trip:
-Average 18.4 miles per hour
- 67.85 miles
- 3:40 minutes riding time
- 19.9 watt hours per mile
- total energy used by bike, 1,350 watt hours (for perspective, a typical gasoline powered car would use this much energy to go about 4-7 miles). I probably burnt another 400-600 watt hours from leg power.
I was nicely surprised by how well most drivers treated us. There was only one situation that made me nervous, a stupid dude in an ancient camper truck passed us at the same time there was oncoming traffic, and only gave 6″ to spare. I don’t know what his deal was, but maybe his engine couldn’t handle slowing down on the somewhat steep uphill we were on, without stalling. Anyway, here’s a plug for rear-view mirrors: I knew the guy was cutting it close, and I was prepared to bail out onto the grass if he got any closer, long before he was upon us. I don’t know how any cyclist can stand riding without a rear-view mirror. I use mine constantly.
But anyway, most drivers gave us wide berth, and we had a really nice ride through the countryside of the piedmont.
3 cheers for human-electric hybrid vehicles!

Bookmark and Share



Peak oil: it’s only an idea

Icon Written by Morgan Giddings on September 4, 2008 – 2:14 pm

I haven’t yet followed up on my third post about peak oil, the concept that initially led us to open Cycle 9.  In a nutshell, that concept is that after world oil production peaks, oil will become more scarce and thus much more costly, impacting the US and world economy in a myriad of ways.  If one reads sites like the oil drum, it is easy to get the notion that these impacts will be very negative.  Like to the point of collapsing civilization.  Those ideas are amplified in books like James Howard Kunstler’s “The Long Emergency”.

For example, there has been recent discussion on The Oil Drum (TOD) about effects on the electric grid by Hurricane Gustav.  With hundreds of thousands of people still without power after that hurricane, it is clear that the regional grid took a big hit.  The TOD folks were postulating that as oil becomes more scarce, repairing things like the grid will become more and more challenging/costly.  The conclusion of some posters was that in future disasters when the grid gets shut down, parts of it might never get repaired.  And so we will begin the slow slide into anarchy/etc.
I was thinking about this and had (what seems like) a crucial revelation.  Peak oil is all about a physical substance – oil.  I agree with TOD folks that it is a crucial substance in our current economy. But it is only a substance.  And there is something far more powerful than substances: ideas.  Seem obvious? No need to read the rest of this post.  But in case you want to read on, I will make the case that ideas are more important than physical realities like the amount of oil we have.
I’ll back up a bit.  A good way of explaining this is to mention the unfortunate events of Sep 11th as a parable.  The event itself was a physical occurrence: planes crashing into the Twin Towers, the subsequent collapse of the towers, and the very unfortunate death of almost 3,000 people.  That’s a lot of people dying in a single event.  But, if we compare that to traffic fatalities, more than that number of people die each month from an activity that is common – driving a car.  So from a pure physical reality standpoint (the numbers dead), driving cars has more human impact every month of every year than Al Queda had hijacking planes once back in 2001.
If that strikes you as “besides the point”, then you are already onto the point I’m about to make.  The unique thing about Sep 11th was not the number of people dead, it was the unique ramifications of that event upon our psyche.  It was the idea that we are vulnerable, that we have enemies, that we can be attacked on our soil, and that it can come out of nowhere on a bright sunny morning.  That idea was a powerful one – enough to cause significant structural changes in how security is done in the USA – witness the resulting department of homeland security (who is probably reading this because I’ve used some flagged terms for their computer systems! DHS – please, read on and enjoy!).
Let’s consider another example.  What is a city?  Wikipedia says: “A city is an urban area with a large population and a particular administrative, legal, or historical status”.  ”Large population” is one of the key elements.  Why is the large population there?  Because of the buildings?  Well, no.  It is because of the idea.  New Orleans, the city, is just an idea.  It remained a city after Katrina, not because some buildings were left standing, but because people decided to go back and to live there.  But, some people never came back – their idea of the city was destroyed by that hurricane. Now, even though it is still called New Orleans, physically it is quite different.  Now let’s imagine that Gustav had been much more damaging – re flooding New Orleans.  Would people have given up on the idea of the city, or come back again to rebuild?  I do not know the answer, but I do know that the future physical reality, i.e. whether buildings got rebuilt, is dependent on the idea of whether it is worth rebuilding.  The idea of New Orleans shared by people is more important than the physical reality of the city.
To further illustrate that point – after a disaster, if one person returns to a city, it is still not a city.  If a hundred people return, it is probably not a city.  If a thousand people return, it might start acting like a city.  Somewhere in there is a critical point where enough people show up to maintain the physical “infrastructure” that we associate with cities – merchants, gas stations, etc.  Less people than that, and it really can’t be considered a city by most people.  What defines that critical number of people?  There is no objective physical reality that defines it – just the idea of a “critical mass” that is enough so that it is self sustaining amongst its participants.  The critical mass depends on many factors, the most important of which are people’s thinking – their ideas about that place being a city.  If enough people have that idea – then it becomes a city.  If they don’t, then it is not.  The idea is the foundation – not the physical reality like the buildings.
I think that we, as a culture, focus way too much on physical reality, believing that it is preeminant and will determine our fate.  That may be true to some extent for individuals – but I believe much less so for societies.  Societies – states and countries – are nothing more and nothing less than ideas.  Just like cities.  The United States is an idea, not a landmass.  Our borders have greatly changed since our country was created – but we still go by the same name.  That’s because we share (kind of) a common idea of what this country is – or we let politicians and celebrities define it for us. Either way, it is all just ideas, not something physically concrete.
I will be exploring this further in a book I am working on.  But in the meantime, let’s get back to the “Peak Oil” idea.
The thing that concerns peak oil folks is not the advent of the world peak in oil production itself.  Well, actually most claim that is what worries them.  But in reading all the blogs and stories about “what might happen” after peak oil – it is not actually about the oil itself, it is about our response to the scarcity of oil.  Our response is the confluence of the physical reality of limited oil, with whatever ideas we hold as a society.  Some, such as Kunstler, think this confluence will lead to increasing chaos and collapse in many parts of the USA and elsewhere.  For example, from his book:

The prospect for disorder in the southeastern states is especially high, given the extremes of religiosity, hyper-individualism, and cultural disinhibition regarding violence.

He has an idea about the south, and what might happen, but is that idea the reality? Not even close. The logic is flawed that somehow because the south is more religious, or more “individual”, that we would react to peak oil more violently is a very tenuous argument.  Besides, I’ve actually encountered much less individualism here than when I lived in the Western US – and I sometimes lament the lack of individuality here.

It is certainly possible that the confluence of the physical event, peak oil, with our ideas may lead to disaster.  Right now, there are unfortunately a whole lot of people who think we can just go on living the same way, driving Hummers and Suburbans at will.  That we have a God-given right to power those cars.  The advent of physical peak oil will be very hard on such folks.  Will they resort to violence? anarchy?  The problem is, it’s very hard to predict.  Social movements are all about ideas.  Right now, it is still somewhat of a status symbol to own and drive a big car.  But what if that changes?  What if it is no longer seen as an appropriate thing for people to do?  Just the mere idea that something is socially unacceptable can have huge ramifications on physical reality of the actions people take.  Sure, there are always laggards who cling to old ways of doing things.  And it is possible that some people, finding themselves unable to afford gas for their car (or unable to even get it if they could afford it) – might resort to violence and mayhem.  And others might respond in kind with violence and mayhem.  If that happens, then the doomsday scenarios of the “die off” peak oil crowd may play out.  But there might also be people (a lot of them) who decide that responding to peak oil with violence and mayhem is not appropriate.  That people responding that way will be chastised, put in jail, or worse.
The whole idea of predicting our responses – the confluence of reality with our ideas – is impossible.  Because ideas can bend so readily.  For example, I have the idea that bikes are a great way to replace a lot of car trips.  That idea is spreading.  If that idea became truly “popular”, it would have a huge impact on the amount of oil we use.  My bike gets the equivalent of 2000 MPG (more when I charge it by solar).  Imagine if 1/2 of the population biked instead of drove every day?  That would suddenly take a whole lot of wind out of the sails of some very rich middle eastern oil exporting countries.  Just that one idea: ride a bike.
The peak oil crowd always targets the idea that there are no viable replacements for our current way of life.  For example, electric cars will be difficult to deploy rapidly enough and with enough power/range to replace gasoline cars.  So, if people have the idea that they have to have a car that can drive long distances, well, a peak oil future might be a grim one.  On the other hand, if people have the idea that, hey, instead of rushing everywhere in a car, it might be fun to take an extended bike tour on an electric assist bike, or take a leisure train ride, then the “need” to have a car might diminish or vanish.  If there is no need to have that car, well, then problem solved.  ”But,” some people complain, “the US is not set up for biking or taking the train.”  To which I would respond: “You haven’t been paying attention.”  I took the train several times this summer, and it was sold out every time.  I bike to work every day from a location that is not in-town.
Many people do live an impractical distance from where they work.  That is because, perhaps, they had the idea of some idyllic living situation in the country, or suburb.  But that idea can change, too.  If it suddenly becomes more cost effective and socially popular to live in the city (which I think is already happening), people will move back into cities.  And probably sell their car in many cases.
The other ideas-related fallacy of peak oil is that all our major roads will deteriorate because they are unmaintainable.  According to them, this will lead to all sorts of problems, because then power lines won’t be maintained, water infrastructure will fail, goods won’t be able to be shipped, etc.
While I once bought into that notion, now I think it’s kind of silly.  For example, in N.C., we have ~4,300 of miles of paved roads.  Many of them used to be gravel, but in the rush to build “modern” roads, more and more got paved over.  Let’s say that it becomes super-expensive or difficult to maintain roads in the future.  Will we just keep trying to maintain all those roads equally?  Or will we decide: the main arterial roads are important for commerce and infrastructure, so let’s focus on maintaining those, and let the minor roads revert back to gravel or dirt?  It all depends on the ideas that we hold.  But it seems to me that most people would place a priority on maintaining the major arterial roads that allow our food to be shipped.  In fact, there are countries like this – Costa Rica has one main arterial road, a two-lane (not even four lane) highway. In some places it has been narrowed to one lane due to landslides and the like.  But, that doesn’t stop people – there is plenty of traffic that uses it for transporting goods and people cross-country. Most of the other roads are dirt, or potholed pavement.  Does their society collapse due to lack of well-maintained superhighways? No.
Jared Diamond, in his book Collapse, examines why some societies have collapsed over time – starting with Easter Islanders.  One can pin the Easter Isle collapse upon lack of resources/deforestation.  But, the key thing thing missing in a purely resource-based analysis is: why did the island become deforested?  It was because of an idea.  The idea was that to please the gods, they had to build more stone statues. And so they kept doing more and more of that until the physical resources were so far gone that the society couldn’t sustain itself.  The “collapse” itself is an ideas-based phenomenon.  That’s probably why the subtitle of Diamond’s book was “How societies choose to fail or succeed.” At Easter island, it seems unlikely that everyone just suddenly died off from starvation.  More likely, a lot of people got off the island as things got worse, taking boats to other islands where things were better.  What really died there was the idea that it was a livable place to be – nothing more.  That society chose to fail. Or, turning it around, the idea of their society was not sustained.
Are we bound to make that same mistake with peak oil?  A lot of people seem to think so.  They think we will keep building cars and highways and airplanes until we are so far gone that there is no return from the brink.  We will have wasted all our energy doing those things, rather than doing things that help us survive – like assuring the production and distribution of food.
That’s where I now diverge with the peak oil people.  I think there is a high likelihood that in many places (not all), people’s ideas will appropriately bend to new circumstances, and life will carry on (in modified form).  That when oil becomes scarce, we will prioritize food production over water skiing.  That we will prioritize medicine over hot rods.  Simple concepts like those would buy us a lot of time to find other ways to power our societies.
One other concept that is important here – particularly in America, we are taught ideas such as the rule of law and fairness.  That is one of the reasons we have such a stable business environment – because, unlike many countries, you don’t have to pay off a bunch of henchmen to open a store.  When people defy this expectation, they are generally chastised and/or punished (excepting our current president, who has done a lot to damage our ideals).
Will everyone just throw those ideals out the window when times get rough?  That’s not generally what happened during any other crisis in our country’s history.  There were strikes and some riots during the great depression, but the country did not fall into anarchy.  Nor did it during the civil war, etc.  While things have become considerably more “individualistic” in the past 20 years, I believe that is just a response to us having so many resources available to us, that we didn’t learn the value (idea) of working together – because we didn’t have to.  But I do think we can learn to do that again, when it becomes necessary.
To be clear: I’m not saying that dealing with oil shortages would/will be easy.  It won’t. In places, food may be scarce (and people will quickly re-learn gardening).  Even where it isn’t, it will be hard for many people to change, to accept new circumstances.  It will be difficult for some to accept that they can’t just go start up the car on a whim and drive across town to the mall.  But, maybe people’s ideas of what is important could change, too.  Maybe it will become more important to people to grow a garden, to visit the neighbors, to take a walk, to read a book.  All things that require miniscule energy inputs.  If our ideas are right, we don’t have to despair if hard times come upon us.
So, I think that the key to surviving a “peak oil” event (as with any event) is having the right ideas about how to survive it.  Those ideas don’t necessarily involve doing more of the same thing we are doing now.  It may involve more bikes and less cars.  It may involve slowing down.  It may involve growing more food in the garden.  It may involve dealing with potholes on the road.  It may even involve frequent power outages (so we’ll have to get more candles).
It is clear that the physical reality of oil supply limitations is coming our way, sooner or later.  If we have the idea that we can just keep doing more of the same, it may be very hard.  But if we change our ideas about what is necessary and useful in life, it could be a non-event.
Tags: , ,

Peak oil, part II

Icon Written by Morgan Giddings on August 12, 2008 – 9:32 pm
This post has been much delayed because of all the work at the shop and for my day job. But it is perhaps more important than ever, given that gas prices have been dropping.

Gas prices dropping makes a lot of people think, phew, the crisis is over. Now things will go back to normal.

Hardly.

There are two issues here. As I mentioned before, we are not running out of oil. But what is happening, is that as more and more countries are competing for this resource, and as it becomes increasingly hard to make more of it, the perceived value of oil goes up.

Take this example. Let’s say I have a commodity like dried corn, stored in some silos in my backyard. Let’s say I have a lot of silos (and hence a lot of corn). It seems like I will never run out. I sell it to my neighbors for cheap, because it is easy to extract from the silos, and I don’t think I’ll run out anytime soon.

But then one day, I check on the corn, and realize it is half gone. This induces a sudden mental shift. Now I am moving from a mode of thinking abundance, to one of thinking scarcity. I need to make sure to ration the corn so I don’t run out too soon. Plus more and more neighbors are knocking on my door looking for corn. What is my response, to sell as much and as cheaply as I can, only to run out soon? Of course not. The rational response is to start raising prices and rationing how much I sell, to maximize both the profit and the length of time I still have corn available to sell.

This analogy applies to oil. Half of the world’s oil is still left (if not a bit more). But suddenly, it is not so easy to just turn the taps to make ever more of it. Producers are realizing that they will run out, someday. And there are ever more countries knocking at the door for that oil. The rational response to this from the producers’ perspective is to raise prices and ration the oil. And so they are. Blaming oil prices on “speculators” just ignores this basic fact of human nature. If there is perceived scarcity of a desirable resource, people will pay more for it, and its producers can ask more for it.

Now, for the folks in the USA, this is a double whammy. That’s because of what we offer in trade for that oil. We offer debt. To the tune of 800 billion USD per year. And we offer printed money. Money that can now be created out of thin air.

What is that competing with? Well, the Chinese offer goods, like computers, bikes, and all sorts of stuff, in trade for the oil they get.

The end result is this puts further downward pressure on the dollar, making oil go up in price relative to the dollar.

Now, we’ve had a brief respite in oil prices. Looking at the numbers, it appears that we’ve had a slight strengthening of dollar value. A source of mine in China hinted that this is due to the Chinese stabilizing the dollar value for the Olympics (by buying dollars). Perhaps.

In any case, it would be foolish to expect it to last, and think things will “just get back to normal” soon.

One more point about this. The concept that oil and energy will get more and more expensive has many scary ramifications. But it also has some positive ones. Here are two examples. The first is a little article in Newsweek about a mom who was recently

forced to rediscover walking and biking as an alternative to driving the car
everywhere. As a bonus, she discovered how pleasant it can be to spend more relaxed time walking or biking to a destination, rather than zooming around in a hurry all the time. This is a sentiment that those of us who have bike commuted for a long time know well. I get angst ridden these days if I have to drive around town. Riding the bike is so much more peaceful.

The second note about this is from an intriguing blog post by Todd from

Clever Cycles
, about his family’s recent bike/camping trip of 190 some odd miles. Here is a great quote
from the article
:

We parked our bikes at the door of our cabin, which led to quite a lot of curious loitering by other visitors to the springs. But we learned quickly to stop telling people that we had biked there with child from Portland because it stopped conversations cold, as either a greener-than-thou affront or just too freaky. “Who drove the support vehicle?” A Dutch family we met there on the last day found out as we were leaving. They were incredulous. I admit that made me proud: Dutch people think we’re hardcore. At the same time, I wish more people understood that biking needn’t be some kind of enviro-martyr stunt, sport, fundraising strategy either personal or institutional, etc.

This speaks about a culture in which cars are prevalent and cheap to operate, so that people think biking is crazy. But if when gas costs $10/gallon or more, people might reconsider that view. The reality is that biking that distance on a normal touring bike is limited to a few hardy folks who have the time and/or physical fitness for such a venture. But doing it on an electric bike is becoming increasingly feasible for a broad swath of people as the technology improves, particularly higher-capacity batteries. Todd and his family did this trip using Xtracycle-style longtail bikes, with their own Stokemonkey electric assist. With the right setup, nearly anyone, of any physical ability could do this. And if people want to be able to do leisure activities like this in the future, gas costs may cause many more folks to take this option seriously.

The second quote from his blog is more sobering:

Our mood took a big hit at Austin Hot Springs, which is right alongside the road. We thought we’d lunch there and maybe take a dip where the hot vents mingle with the cold river water. We rolled up to the river’s edge, between trucks, and beheld a sickening spectacle: trash, trash everywhere. Brawndo cans and Doritos bags, used tampons and condoms, excrement-smeared toilet paper, giant bean cans, inflatable water toys, cassette tape fluttering, cigarette butts and beer bottles, some broken. Green trees sawed down and dragged halfway into fire rings. And there in the clear water, some yahoos had submerged a large roll of carpet and weighted it down with rocks so bathers could avoid coming in contact with the riverbed. It was a crying Indian moment. Anger and shame drove us back to the road.

This is sad indeed. But it also speaks of a culture that does not value the gifts we’ve been given. The US has been the beneficiary of the biggest boost in wealth and prosperity for a broad swath of the populace in history. Part of this boost has been the result of cheap oil. This has allowed people to do things like joyride in their cars up to a hotspring, litter and pollute it, and joyride back home. Somehow I have a feeling that if getting there were a bit more difficult (like requiring a 4 hour bike ride), this wouldn’t have happened. The people who would get there would be people who really appreciate the beauty and value of the place, and are willing to work to get to it. Drunken teens would be unlikely to make the trek, especially with a carpet in tow to throw in there. It is sad that our culture now takes for granted the great prosperity we have been lucky to have. Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on how you view it), this is changing. In the future, we as a society and country may be forced to start appreciating the gifts we have, since they’re likely to not be so plentiful.

Now, in part I I promised to mention how Peak Oil led to a bike shop. That is coming, soon in Part III.

- Morgan